<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Matters &#187; eMarketer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters/tag/emarketer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters</link>
	<description>Just another Imagination Publishing Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Custom Means Quality</title>
		<link>http://blogs.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters/custom-means-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters/custom-means-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle O'Hagan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branded Content Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eMarketer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A passage in a recent eMarketer article, Magazines Run Online, reminds us once again why &#8216;quantity&#8217; isn&#8217;t the end-all, be-all. “Years of inflated circulation rate bases have backfired,” says Ms. Krol. “Magazines chased volume, banking on a larger set of readers to justify advertising rate increases. Unfortunately, that bloated universe of readers often proved less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A passage in a recent eMarketer article, <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1006994" target="_blank">Magazines Run Online</a>, reminds us once again why &#8216;quantity&#8217; isn&#8217;t the end-all, be-all.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Years of inflated circulation rate bases have backfired,” says Ms. Krol. “Magazines chased volume, banking on a larger set of readers to justify advertising rate increases. Unfortunately, that bloated universe of readers often proved less profitable.”</p>
<p>Some publishers, such as Newsweek, have responded by pruning their audiences to a smaller, more desirable demographic.</p>
<p>The big move in publishing, however, is online. But the transition may be coming too late for many titles.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article is focused on consumer titles, but the lesson is clear: You cannot chase &#8220;all&#8221; readers&#8211;and practically give away your content ($10/year subscription for some of the titles to which I subscribe)&#8211;and expect to stay profitable.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons custom publishing hasn&#8217;t hit the skids like so many other types of publishing these days. In custom magazines, the content is targeted to a specific (sometimes, an extremely specific) audience. These people want what they&#8217;re getting (quality, not quantity). The content is valuable to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.imaginepub.com/marketingmatters/custom-means-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
